|

|
STAC
Project Information Center
STATEMENT OF WORK
Project Title:
Building Commissioning – Innovation to Practice
Contractor:
California Energy Commission (CEC)
1516 Ninth St, MS-43
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 654-4086
Program Area:
Buildings
Partners:
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA)
Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES)
Oregon Dept. of Energy (ODOE)
University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL)
Project Description:
Conduct a high-impact integrated research, development, initial
deployment, and information dissemination program directed at quickly
overcoming owner and industry barriers to the adoption of building
commissioning in existing and new commercial and government buildings.
Organization
|
Staff Person
|
STAC Administrator
|
Program Manager
|
Program Director
|
Management Team
|
Technical Team
|
Partner
|
Participating States
|
| California Energy Commission |
Martha Brook |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
Idaho State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
| Iowa Energy Center (IEC) |
John House |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
X |
| Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
(LBNL) |
Philip Haves |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Montana State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
| New York State Energy Research and
Development Authority (NYSERDA) |
Kim Schryer |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
X |
| Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) |
John Jennings |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
| Oregon Department of Energy (ODOE) |
Andrzej Pekalski |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
X |
| Portland Energy Conservation Inc. (PECI) |
Tudi Haasl |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
| Texas Engineering Experiment Station
(TEES) |
Malcolm Verdict |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
| University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) |
Mingsheng Lui |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
| Washington State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
Management Plan
The unique nature of STAC requires that projects be supported by
multiple State entities, and to the extent necessary any other entity. As
indicated in the STAC Agreement, it is the Contractor’s responsibility to
coordinate the execution of work under the Contract, incorporated by
reference hereto. Contractor, in conjunction with the other State
entities, and to the extent necessary any other entity, shall conduct the
project in accordance with the Management Plan – Task 1: Administration -
described below.
Task 1: Administration
The CEC will serve as team leader and single point of contact with
NASEO regarding this contract and the conduct, direction, and management
of this collaborative effort. Martha Brook, a key member of the CEC’s
Public Interest Energy Research Buildings Program with significant
knowledge and experience in managing large, multi-disciplined RD&D
programs for building commissioning, controls and diagnostics, will serve
as Program Manager. She will be responsible for coordination with NASEO
and the other Program Cosponsors on all contracting, subcontracting,
technical program management, and information dissemination aspects of
this program. Tudi Haasl of PECI will act as the Program Director, who
will report to Martha Brook as overall Program Manager of this
collaborative effort.
Under the direction of Ms. Brook, the Management Team will use various
communication mechanisms, such as periodic conference calls, phone, and
e-mail with the Program Director and the Technical Team to coordinate,
manage, and direct this effort. As one key step in this program management
process, the Management Team will schedule a quarterly conference call to
review the Technical and Cost Management Report (prepared under the
direction of the Program Director) that will summarize the technical
progress of each task, including the initial product deployment activities
being conducted in each state and region.
Task 2: Enhance the Functional Test Guide for Air Handling Systems (FT
Guide)
An enhanced FT Guide will be produced in this task. The current version
of the FT Guide (http://eetd2.lbl.gov/ftg/ftg-reg.php)
will be used as the basis for the enhancements.
PECI will:
- conduct training through a web conference to the participating state
providers on how to effectively use the FT Guide,
- survey the providers, both individually and as a group, once the FT
Guide has been used and tested in practical use,
- summarize findings that address needed revisions to the FT Guide’s
content, functionality and presentation,
- based on the findings, revise and disseminate the FT Guide to all
participating states and providers.
Each participating state (CA,NY,IA, OR,WA) will:
- solicit functional test (FT) providers (e.g., commissioning
providers, building operators, designers, and contractors) to
participate in the pilot functional testing guide,
- select approximately 15 participants across the five states to use
the FT Guide in building commissioning projects.
The following organizations shall perform Task 2: CEC, NYSERDA, ODOE,
Task 3: Develop Additional Functional Tests for FT Guide
In this task, additional functional tests will be added to the FT Guide
produced in Task 2.
PECI will:
- develop a list of important functional tests that are not currently
covered in the publicly available library of tests, or tests that are
not covered in adequate detail for a provider to understand how to
perform the test. The top criteria for test selection will be energy
efficiency, reliability, and comfort. Feedback from Task 2 will be
utilized in identifying and prioritizing additional needed tests. The
top 20-25 tests from the prioritized list will be developed and
incorporated into the FT Guide.
Each participating state (NY, CA, and IA) will:
- solicit functional test providers (e.g., commissioning providers,
building operators, designers, and contractors) to participate in the
review and field test of the newly developed functional tests.
The following organizations shall perform Task 3: CEC, NYSERDA
Task 4: Commissioning Training Using FT Guide
Training curriculums will be developed in this task.
PECI will:
- develop a one-day, interaction training curriculum that teaches test
providers how the FT Guide and the CTPL can be useful in streamlining
their functional testing process,
- develop a four-day curriculum that will cover the retro
commissioning process and technical methods for identifying
opportunities,
- include instruction on how the FT Guide and the CTPL can be useful
in streamlining testing,
- include standardized spreadsheets for energy and economic analysis,
- present both the new and existing building commissioning training
workshops in NY CA, IA, OR, WA, ID, and MT.
The following organizations shall perform Task 4: CEC, NYSERDA, ODOE
Task 5: Develop/Deploy Functional Testing Checklist Tool
A Functional Testing Checklist Tool will be developed in this task that
will allow the user to enter general project information such as system
type, building activity, and level of testing budget and then generate a
checklist of functional tests that should be done for those particular
systems in the operating environment indicated.
PECI will:
- develop the checklist that will link to example tests available
through the FT Guide and to explanations of benefits and field tips for
performing the tests,
- provide a web conference training session as a kick-off to the pilot
in the participating states (NY,CA,IA,OR,WA),
- solicit feedback from the state pilot participants and use to modify
the tool.
Each of the five participating states (NY,CA,IA,OR,WA) will:
- solicit functional test providers to further participate in the
pilot,
- feedback will be summarized and used to further modify the checklist
tool.
The following organizations shall perform Task 5: CEC, NYSERDA, ODOE
Task 6: Develop/Deploy Functional Test Data Analysis Tool
A Functional Test Data Analysis Tool will be developed in this task.
This tool will use a library of data analysis routines to analyze test
data, assess performance of the unit, and identify the likely causes of
failure.
PECI in conjunction with IEC:
- The IEC will first beta-test the functional test data analysis tool
in the Energy Resource Station test facility.
- Then test providers in NY and CA will pilot the tool in actual
building applications.
The following organizations shall perform Task 6: CEC, NYSERDA
Task 7: Automated Building Commissioning Analysis Tool (ABCAT)
An advanced prototype version of an Automated Building Commissioning
Analysis Tool will be developed and demonstrated in this task. The CEC
will, through their contract with PECI, provide expert review and
management oversight for this task, but all the development and
demonstration efforts will be completed by TEES, UNL and NYSERDA. ABCAT
will become a cost-effective, user-friendly, web-based tool for online
detection and diagnostics of building performance and will project the
economic benefits from correcting degradation of the building systems.
PECI will provide management oversight and expert review:
ABCAT will be developed and tested in three distinct building types:
- a new medium-sized, high-performance building in Texas,
- one or more air-handling systems in large university buildings
served by a central plant at Texas A&M,
- a large, high-rise commercial office building in Nebraska, and
- 2-4 buildings in New York.
TEES and UNL will:
- train test site participants in New York and Texas to test the
prototype version of ABCAT, to provide timely feedback for necessary
modifications during and after the commissioning process.
- host a one-day workshop in New York to train test site participants
in the use of the tools.
The following organizations shall perform Task 7: CEC, NYSERDA, TEES,
UNL
Project Tasks, Status, and Deliverables
Task #
|
Description
|
Status
|
Deliverable(s)
|
|
1 |
Administration |
|
|
|
2 |
Enhance Functional Testing Guide (FTG)
for Air Handling Systems |
|
|
|
3 |
Develop Additional Functional Tests for
FTG |
|
- Completed Functional Tests
- Revised FT Guide Incorporating New Functional Tests
|
|
4 |
Commissioning Training Using FT Guide |
|
- New Building Commission Training Curriculum
- Workshop Proceedings for Existing and New Building Training
Workshops
|
|
5 |
Develop/Deploy Functional Testing
Checklist Tool |
|
- Revised Functional Testing Checklist Tool
- Report on Functional Testing Checklist Tool Training Pilot in 5
States
|
|
6 |
Develop/Deploy Functional Test Data
Analysis Tool |
|
- Revised Functional Data Analysis Tool
- Summary of Feedback on the Functional Test Data Analysis Tool
|
|
7 |
Develop Automated Building Commissioning
Analysis Tool (ABCAT) |
|
- Report on Development and Demonstration of Automated Building
Analysis Tool (ABCAT)
|
|